Yield pigs suffer losses chasing yields in REITs and oil.
A better approach is a portfolio of consumer and utility stocks anchored by the S&P 500 and Berkshire Hathaway.
Seth Klarman has wise words for yield pigs.
click here to read more
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Income For Millionaires
click here to read more
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
Why Bitcoin Is Rising
Why Bitcoin Is Rising
Summary
Over 700 crypto currencies exist. Bitcoin is used to buy other cryptocurrencies, which increases demand for Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is up 82% to $1700 on May 9 from $935 on March 24.
Japan approves Bitcoin as a legal form of payment April 1. Blockchain technology gives credibility to digital currencies.
Investors may want to consider investing a small percentage of their net worth in crypto currencies like Bitcoin. I started buying Bitcoin in February and plan to put about 1% to 2% of my net worth in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies by summer's end. I think Bitcoin could reach $2,000 by year end.
Friday, May 5, 2017
$380 Million Breakup Fee Is Year's Earnings At Westar Energy
Great Plains Energy (GXP) will have to pay $380 million break up fee to Westar Energy (WR) if it fails to consummate an acquisition of Westar.
“In the event we would need to pay a termination fee, the applicable fee would be $380 million,” said Lori Wright, of Great Plains Energy.
The $380 million fee would be slightly more than what Westar Energy earns in a year. The company earned $347 million, or $2.43 per share, for 2016 compared with earnings of $292 million, or $2.11 per share, for 2015.
Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy recently filed a petition with the Kansas Corporation Commission requesting more time to consider a merger.
On April 19, 2017, The KCC denied approval of Great Plains Energy’s acquisition of Westar.
The new petition for reconsideration requests additional time until May 31, 2017, to allow further discussions between Great Plains Energy and Westar to determine if a mutually agreeable revised transaction might be negotiated that resolves the concerns identified by the KCC, while preserving meaningful benefits for customers and shareholders.
If you read the original order denying the sale of Westar Energy, you get the idea that the Kansas Corporation Commission left no room for negotiation. It appears the KCC hates the deal, period.
Great Plains is trying to salvage the situation. The company does not want to pay a $380 million breakup fee.
Thursday, May 4, 2017
Westar Energy & Great Plains Ask For More Time To Consider Merger
Great Plains Energy Incorporated
(NYSE: GXP) and Westar Energy, Inc. (NYSE: WR) have filed a petition with the Kansas Corporation Commission for more time to consider a merger.
On April 19, 2017, The KCC denied approval of Great Plains Energy’s acquisition of Westar.
The new petition for reconsideration requests additional time until May 31, 2017, to allow further discussions between Great Plains Energy and Westar to determine if a mutually agreeable revised transaction might be negotiated that resolves the concerns identified by the KCC, while preserving meaningful benefits for customers and shareholders.
If the companies are able to reach and announce an agreement, they will immediately engage with the other parties to the proceeding in order to address their concerns and set a new procedural schedule that allows all parties and the KCC adequate time to review the matter.
“We continue to firmly believe that combining Great Plains Energy and Westar creates significant value for customers, employees and communities in Kansas and Missouri as well as for our shareholders. Since announcing this transaction, we have completed integration planning, and this work has only reinforced our belief in the value of this combination,” said Terry Bassham, chairman and chief executive officer of Great Plains Energy “By joining our companies, we together can establish a leading Midwest energy company that creates benefits for all stakeholders that neither company could achieve on its own.”
Mark Ruelle, president and chief executive officer of Westar, said, “A combination of these two companies and the efficiencies it would create helps address the headwinds of rising costs for our customers. We are hopeful we can reach a revised agreement that paves the way for the completion of our transaction and the realization of its many customer benefits.”
Bassham said, “We have heard the Commission regarding the structure of the transaction, including its concerns related to purchase price, capital structure, quantifiable and demonstrable customer benefits, and staffing levels in Westar’s service territory. Given the unique benefits resulting from our combination, we believe it is appropriate to explore whether there is room to work with Westar and directly address these areas, while maintaining the shareholder value creation opportunity inherent in this merger. In any case, we would only pursue a revised agreement if we determined that it delivered more value than Great Plains was able to achieve on a stand-alone basis.”
Perhaps the biggest concern by the KCC is the amount of debt that Great Plains is taking on to buy Westar Energy in the $12 billion deal. Regulators feared that the entity would be unable to service the debt without raising rates on customers. The KCC saw no value for the customer in the original transaction.
The Kansas Corporation Commission's order rejecting the sale of Westar Energy to Great Plains Energy, citing a failure to meet its merger standards.
"The Joint Application is denied," The 51-page order says. "The Commission finds the proposed transaction is not in the public interest and rejects Great Plains' application to acquire Westar. Both Parties have 15 days from the date of electronic service of this Order to petition for reconsideration."
The order also said, "Great Plains Energy does not dispute that they will incur a large amount of debt to acquire Westar. Nor does it dispute it has no written plan to de-leverage. The Joint Application is deficient. It does not include plans showing which generation plants will be retired early. There are no examples of reduced spending through procurement savings and no evidence that customers will see any savings. The Joint Application simply does not give the Commission any assurances that it will be able to service the newly-incurred debt without raising rates or reducing services. Therefore, the Commission has no choice but to find the proposed transaction is not in the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission denies GPE's application to acquire Westar."
On April 19, 2017, The KCC denied approval of Great Plains Energy’s acquisition of Westar.
The new petition for reconsideration requests additional time until May 31, 2017, to allow further discussions between Great Plains Energy and Westar to determine if a mutually agreeable revised transaction might be negotiated that resolves the concerns identified by the KCC, while preserving meaningful benefits for customers and shareholders.
If the companies are able to reach and announce an agreement, they will immediately engage with the other parties to the proceeding in order to address their concerns and set a new procedural schedule that allows all parties and the KCC adequate time to review the matter.
“We continue to firmly believe that combining Great Plains Energy and Westar creates significant value for customers, employees and communities in Kansas and Missouri as well as for our shareholders. Since announcing this transaction, we have completed integration planning, and this work has only reinforced our belief in the value of this combination,” said Terry Bassham, chairman and chief executive officer of Great Plains Energy “By joining our companies, we together can establish a leading Midwest energy company that creates benefits for all stakeholders that neither company could achieve on its own.”
Mark Ruelle, president and chief executive officer of Westar, said, “A combination of these two companies and the efficiencies it would create helps address the headwinds of rising costs for our customers. We are hopeful we can reach a revised agreement that paves the way for the completion of our transaction and the realization of its many customer benefits.”
Bassham said, “We have heard the Commission regarding the structure of the transaction, including its concerns related to purchase price, capital structure, quantifiable and demonstrable customer benefits, and staffing levels in Westar’s service territory. Given the unique benefits resulting from our combination, we believe it is appropriate to explore whether there is room to work with Westar and directly address these areas, while maintaining the shareholder value creation opportunity inherent in this merger. In any case, we would only pursue a revised agreement if we determined that it delivered more value than Great Plains was able to achieve on a stand-alone basis.”
Perhaps the biggest concern by the KCC is the amount of debt that Great Plains is taking on to buy Westar Energy in the $12 billion deal. Regulators feared that the entity would be unable to service the debt without raising rates on customers. The KCC saw no value for the customer in the original transaction.
The Kansas Corporation Commission's order rejecting the sale of Westar Energy to Great Plains Energy, citing a failure to meet its merger standards.
"The Joint Application is denied," The 51-page order says. "The Commission finds the proposed transaction is not in the public interest and rejects Great Plains' application to acquire Westar. Both Parties have 15 days from the date of electronic service of this Order to petition for reconsideration."
The order also said, "Great Plains Energy does not dispute that they will incur a large amount of debt to acquire Westar. Nor does it dispute it has no written plan to de-leverage. The Joint Application is deficient. It does not include plans showing which generation plants will be retired early. There are no examples of reduced spending through procurement savings and no evidence that customers will see any savings. The Joint Application simply does not give the Commission any assurances that it will be able to service the newly-incurred debt without raising rates or reducing services. Therefore, the Commission has no choice but to find the proposed transaction is not in the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission denies GPE's application to acquire Westar."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)